Header with photo

Header with photo
Showing posts with label Technical Elements Score. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Technical Elements Score. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 February 2014

Reviewing the Top two Finishers in the Free Dance Portion of the Olympic Team Event

We received an email request to explain the levels of the top two finishers in the Olympic Team Event Free Dance. We have tried to explain the calls for the levels from what we can see in the videos available to the public. Here is the breakdown of the scores: 

http://www.sochi2014.com/en/figure-skating-team-ice-dance-free-dance 

The various turns you will see in these step sequences have been discussed in this entry:

http://icedanceanalysts.blogspot.ca/2013/11/to-everything-turn-turn-turn-turns-in.html

Let's have a look at the step sequences for these two teams, keeping in mind that the judges are looking for distinct edges (they have to be sure the skater is on the required edge--edge quality is accounted for in GOEs):

We'll first look at the requirements for the circular and diagonal step sequences for the free dance, both of which are done in hold.




Here is the circular step sequence for the team that finished first in this segment of the event, Meryl Davis/Charlie White for which they received a level 3.




Davis /White likely did not receive credit for their rocker. Davis’s blade goes flat on the entry edge when it should remain a right forward outside edge throughout. 





Here is their diagonal step sequence for which they received a level 4:




In the diagonal, White placed his blade on a flat for the exit edge of the first choctaw (beginning of diagonal step sequence) instead of a right back outside edge. We are surprised they received credit for this turn.





On the rocker, it appears Davis’s blade was barely on a right forward outside edge for her exit edge. 






Let's have a look at the lift requirements.





They struggled in transitioning into the rotational portion of this lift, but that would affect GOEs as they still completed the requirements for a level 4 for the first part of the combination lift. The main problem occurs on White’s rotations for the second part of this lift. After 5 rotations, White stops his rotation and therefore does not complete the 6 rotations necessary from the lifting partner for a rotational lift to be deemed level 4. We were surprised they received a level 4 for this lift. 







Virtue/Moir had a bit of a struggle getting into the straight line lift, which resulted in lower GOEs. They did however meet the requirements for a level 4 straight line lift, with Virtue leaning out forwards with her support point being her leg and Moir transitioning from a spread eagle (on a straight line) to a one foot position. The creative/difficult entry is Virtue’s “significant transitional movement…to reach and establish the desired pose”. 






Let's have a look at their circular step sequence for which they received a level 3:




In the circular step sequence, perhaps the panel felt that Virtue did not show a distinct enough forward outside edge which is required as the exit edge for this choctaw. 







And here is their diagonal step sequence for which they received a level 2:




In the diagonal, we believe it was Virtue's counter (entry edge) and her choctaw (exit edge) in the first section of the sequence that caused them to go down to a level 2.

On the counter, perhaps the technical panel felt Virtue didn't hold the right back inside long enough for the entry edge.





On the choctaw, it appears Virtue places her blade on a bit of a flat or barely an outside edge before quickly leaning onto the right back outside edge that is required for this choctaw.




What did you think of the ice dance portion of the team event? Let us know in the comments section!

Friday, 15 November 2013

How to Read (and Understand) a Protocol

The protocol is available after each segment of the competition and will tell you how each judge scored each element and aspect of the program. Each element will appear in the left column with the level the technical panel has assigned to it. The Base Value that has been decided upon in the Handbook forTechnical Panels appears under “Base” followed by the GOE awarded by each judge. For the pattern dance element, the key points are indicated with “Y” (for a key point achieved) and “N” (for a key point missed) and “T” (for a key point achieved but with one or more steps/edges not being held for the required number of beats).

So what do all those strange combinations of letters mean? 

NtMiSt=Not Touching Midline Step Sequence
NtDiSt=Not Touching Diagonal Step Sequence
NtCiSt=Not Touching Circular Step Sequence
MiSt=Midline Step Sequence
DiSt= Diagonal Step Sequence
CiSt=Circular Step Sequence
SeSt= Serpentine Step Sequence

StaLi=Stationary Lift
SlLi=Straight Line Lift
CuLi=Curve Lift
SeLi=Serpentine Lift
RoLi=Rotational Lift
RRoLi=Reverse Rotational Lift
Combination Lifts will include both lifts with a ‘+’ in between
ChLi=Choreographic Lift          Note: This lift is always assessed at level 1

Sp=Spin
CoSp=Combination Spin

STw=Synchronized Twizzles

1FS=Finnstep Section 1
2FS= Finnstep Section 2

How to Calculate TES

Here is an example from Skate Canada International 2013. In the first segment of the Finnstep, this team received credit for the first and third key points. A completed pattern with two key points translates to a level 3 for this element. All three key points were achieved on the second segment of the pattern, translating to a level 4 for this element.

So how do we get from a Base Value of 29.00 points to a total of 35.34 points? First, remove the highest and lowest score for each element (we have highlighted the highest in green and the lowest in yellow).

Element
Base
J1
J2
J3
J4
J5
J6
J7
J8
GOE
TOTAL
NtMiSt4
8.00
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3.00
11.00
1FS3+YNY
6.00
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
1.00
7.00
2FS4+YYY
7.00
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1.00
8.00
STw2
4.00
0
-1
1
1
1
0
2
-1
.17
4.17
RoLi4
4.00
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
1.17
5.17
TOTAL
29.00
6.34
35.34

Next take each judge’s GOE score and match it up to the corresponding value from the Scale of Values. Average these numbers and round to 2 decimals. Then add this average GOE to the Base Value, and you have the total value for that element.

Example #1: Let's look at the synchronized twizzles (STw) which was assessed a level 2. The Base Value is therefore 4.0 and the GOEs range from -1 to +2. The corresponding values from the SoV are listed in the right column.

J#
GOE
SoV
1
0
0
2
-1
-0.5
3
1
0.5
4
1
0.5
5
1
0.5
6
0
0

AVE
0.17
Example #2:  Let's look at the rotational lift (RoLi4) which was assessed a level 4. The Base Value is therefore 4.0 and the GOEs range from +2 to +3. The corresponding values from the SoV are listed in the right column.

J#
GOE
SoV
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
1
4
3
1.5
6
2
1
7
3
1.5

AVE
1.17

Adding this average GOE to the Base Value                    Adding this average GOE to the Base Value
we get: 4.00+0.17=4.17                                                 we get: 4.00+1.17=5.17                          
Thus, the element is worth 4.17 points.                           Thus, the element is worth 5.17 points.


                                       How to Calculate PCS

First remove the highest and lowest score for each category (we have highlighted the low in green and the high in yellow) and then average the scores for each category. This column of numbers is what you will always see on the protocol sheet but they are not the actual numbers that are used in calculating the PCS. For this, you need the factored scores.
To get those, you would next multiply the average for each category by its factor to get the factored score. The total PCS is the sum of all factored scores.

Category
Factor
J1
J2
J3
J4
J5
J6
J7
J8
Average
 of Scores
Factored
Scores
SS
0.8
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.25
9.50
9.00
9.25
8.75
9.33
7.46
TR
0.7
9.25
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.50
9.25
9.50
9.50
9.46
6.62
PE
0.7
9.50
9.25
9.50
9.75
9.25
9.00
9.25
9.75
9.42
6.59
CH
0.8
9.50
9.50
9.75
9.50
9.75
9.25
9.50
9.25
9.50
7.60
IN
1.0
9.50
9.50
9.75
9.75
9.50
9.00
9.50
9.50
9.54
9.54
TOTAL
4.0
47.25
37.82

For example, for the scores for SS you would toss out the scores from J3 and J8. Then average the rest of the scores, which will give you 9.33 (which IS displayed on the protocol sheet). Multiply that by a factor of 0.80 for a score 7.46 which is used in calculating the final PCS but is NOT displayed on the protocol.


Any additional deductions will be indicated below these sections on the protocol.