TECHNICAL ELEMENTS SCORE (TES)
The score for each element has two components: a Base Value and a Grade of Execution (GOE).
The technical panel assigns a Base Value and Level of
Difficulty to an element based on criteria the ISU has laid out in their Handbook for Technical Panels 2013. These criteria have been developed by a group of experts that
includes elite skaters and coaches and are reviewed and updated annually. The
number of points in the Base Value depends on the difficulty of the element,
with higher levels corresponding to more difficult elements (with the maximum
level being 4) and therefore a
higher Base Value.
It is the job of the judges to determine a Grade of
Execution for each identified element (which appears on their screens) on a scale of -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3. The GOE is an assessment of the
quality of each performed element based on criteria found on pages 11-13 in the Handbook for Referees and Judges 2013. The GOE is then converted to a value based of the Scale of
Values (SoV) which can be found in ISU Communication 1787 and ISUCommunication 1805. This value, which can be positive or negative, is then
added to the Base Value to determine the total number of points for the
performed element. The TES is a sum of the Base Value+GOE value after
conversion through SoV for all elements performed.
PROGRAM COMPONENTS
SCORE (PCS)
The PCS is divided into five categories, all of which have
specific characteristics. The
columns on the left and in the middle are taken directly from pages 14 to 16 of the Handbook for Referees and Judges 2013.
In the column to the right we have attempted to
point you to things to look out for in a program that is worthy of a strong
PCS.
Category
|
Characteristics
|
What You Want to Look For
|
Skating Skills
Overall skating quality: edge control and flow
over the ice surface demonstrated by a command of the skating vocabulary
(edges, steps, turns etc.), the clarity of technique and the use of
effortless power to accelerate and vary speed.
|
· balance and rhythmic knee
action and precision of foot placement
· flow and effortless glide
· cleanness and sureness of deep
edges, steps and turns
· power/energy and acceleration
· mastery of multi directional
skating
· mastery of one foot skating
· equal mastery of technique by
both partners and ice coverage
|
· the way in which speed is
generated: you want to see deep knee bends (which results in smoother
movement) and efficient strokes (the blade should cover a good distance with
each stroke, minimizing the need to take many strokes or steps)
· turns both clockwise and
counter clockwise and skating that moves both forward and backward
· one-foot skating
· minimal snow coming from the
blades
· variations in speed, both
overall and in terms of the tempo of the steps
· these qualities should be exhibited
equally by both partners
|
Transitions
The varied and or intricate footwork, positions,
movements and holds that link all elements and constitute the distinct
technical content of the dance.
|
· Variety
· Difficulty
· Intricacy
· Quality (including unison)
· Balance of workload
· Variety of holds
|
· different kinds of transitions
· difficulty of the transitions
themselves (look for transitions skated on one foot, turns, sustained edges,
and changes of edge)
· number of transitions
· shared difficulty between
partners
· use of numerous distinct holds
· well executed transitions
|
Performance/Execution
Performance – The involvement of the Couple
physically, emotionally and intellectually as they
translate the intent of the music and the
choreography.
Execution – The quality of movement and precision
in delivery. This includes harmony of movement.
|
· Physical, emotion, and
intellectual involvement
· Carriage
· Style and
individuality/personality
· Clarity of movement
· Variety and contrast
· Projection
· Unison and “oneness”
· Balance in performing
· Spatial awareness between
partners – management of the distance between partners and management of
changes of hold
|
· immersion of the skaters in the program, their ability to create and
maintain a strong connection to the audience
· clean lines and proper
alignment throughout the body
· matched bodies (look
particularly at the free legs)
· matching stroking styles and
harmonious movement styles
· little distance between their bodies
(look at separations between their blades and between their torsos)
|
Choreography
An intentional, developed and/or original
arrangement of all types of movements according to the principles of
proportion, unity, space, pattern, structure and phrasing.
|
· Purpose (idea, concept, vision)
· Proportion (equal weight of
parts)
· Unity (purposeful threading)
· Pattern and ice coverage
· Phrasing and form (movements
and parts are structured to match the phrasing of the music)
· Originality of purpose,
movement and design
· Shared responsibility of
achieving purpose
· Conformity to pattern and stop
requirements (Short Dance only)
|
· elements, linking steps and
movements corresponding to the music
· movements and steps that are
cohesive and convey a theme or concept, with equal attention given to all
parts of the program
· skaters making use of the space
around their bodies
· patterns (created by the
skaters as they move across the ice) that are interesting and varied, and do NOT
just travel from one end of the rink to the other
· both partners participating
equally in achieving the above
|
Interpretation
The personal and creative translation of the
rhythm
and/or
character and content of the music to movement on ice.
|
· Effortless movement in time to
the music (timing)
· Expression of the music’s
style, character and rhythm
· Use of finesse to reflect the
nuances of the music
· Relationship between the
partners reflecting the character of the music
· Appropriateness of music
· Skating primarily to the
rhythmic beat for Short Dance and keeping a good balance between skating to
the beat and melody in the Free Dance
Finesse is the Skaters’ refined, artful
manipulation of nuances. Nuances are the personal artistic ways of
bringing variations to the intensity, tempo, and
dynamics of the music made by the composer and/or musicians
|
· skaters responding to the
rhythm, tempo, and phrasing of the music
· skaters engaging their entire
bodies and using their skating skills to interpret the music (look for the involvement
of their blades in the movements—you want to see movement that is grounded in
sound skating skills)
|
Please see also:
Judges uses the following scale to determine their PCS
marks:
Approximately 25%
1-Very Poor
2-Poor
3-Weak
Between 25-50%
4-Fair
Approximately 50%
5-Average
Between 50-75%
6-Above Average
75%
7-Good
8-Very Good
Over 75%
9-Superior
10-Outstanding
Approximately 25%
1-Very Poor
2-Poor
3-Weak
Between 25-50%
4-Fair
Approximately 50%
5-Average
Between 50-75%
6-Above Average
75%
7-Good
8-Very Good
Over 75%
9-Superior
10-Outstanding
Please see pages 16 to 18 of the Handbook for Referees and Judges 2013 for further explanation of the
characteristics that correspond to the range of marks
So this is what the judges use to determine PCS. I have often wondered what they are supposed to use because there are times I just haven't got why one team got the numbers they did.
ReplyDeleteI don't think these criteria are being applied properly these days. The leading team, DW, do not exactly embody the things listed above yet receive lots of 10s while teams that actually do excel at things like edge control, line, carriage, and dancing in hold are marked below them.
ReplyDeleteLook at what happened at the GPF. These rules mean nothing. The Canadian couple should have won the PCS. I am even more convinced after reading your descriptions of the criteria.
DeleteThe American couple is the most exciting and energetic team out there, but the Canadians are much better skaters and are the true dancers. Their posture and line is impeccable, and everything they do looks effortless.
I think the race for bronze is going to be very interesting. lots of great teams who can rise to the occasion.